Rep Kucinich Rewrites HR 2977 -
'Chemtrails' Disappear
By Lorie KramerThe "Space Preservation Act of 2001" originally introduced in the House by Rep. Dennis Kucinich as HR 2977 has been re-written. The new, revised bill, HR 3616, "Space Preservation Act of 2002" was introduced January 23, 2002.Re-writing bills is a common enough practice as a bill goes through the legislative process. However, the differences between HR 2977 and HR 3616 are more than just a few tweaks here or there.
By its conspicuous appearance in 2977, the term 'chemtrails' received a form of credibiity within the official government process never seen before...producing the hope that one courageous Representative had finally had the fortitude to take the issue of chemtrails to a level of Congressional scrutiny long overdue.
Even though chemtrails are sprayed/deployed in the 2-6 mile high range, and not the 60 mile altitude stated in 2977, the simple fact of their inclusion in Kucinich's 2977 list of weapons systems was deemed a major breakthrough by tens of thousands of citizens and researchers across the country who have been monitoring and investigating the spraying going on in the skies of America for the past three years.
In Rep. Kucinich's revised new (some woud say 'emasculated') Bill, HR 3616, there is no longer any mention whatever of:
* chemtrails,
* particle beams
* electromagnetic radiation
* plasmas
* extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation
* or mind-control technologies as weapons systems covered in the measure.In fact, 'Exotic Weapons' - as boldly-stated in HR 2977 - are not even mentioned in HR 3616.
So, what happened here? Did someone have a 'friendly chat' with Rep. Kucinich? Did the Congressman inhale a bit too much aluminum during his morning job? Did he look up one day and find himself standing under a big 'X' and feel his knees get a little wobbly?
As stated in Kucinich's first version of his "Space Preservation Act of 2001" -
"The term 'exotic weapons systems' includes weapons designed to damage space or natural ecosystems (such as the ionosphere and upper atmosphere) or climate, weather, and tectonic systems with the purpose of inducing damage or destruction upon a target population or region on earth or in space."
Apparently Rep. Kucinich is no longer concerned about the effects of the testing and use of exotic weapons systems on natural ecosystems and living organisms on the planet.
Although chemtrails are no longer stated as a weapons system, or even mentioned in HR3616, the question of the components of the RFMP / VTRPE warfare system is raised.
HR 3616 states -"To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes."
The intent of this passage remains fuzzy. Example: Are Imaging satellites used with the RFMP / VTRPE system broadly defined as part of a weapons system ?
HR 3616 further states -"The terms 'space-based weapon' and 'space-based system' mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person by directing a source of energy against that object or person."
The word "directing" is clearly the key. Strictly speaking, the RFMP system does, by imaging, provide information to direct a source of energy against that particular object or person HR3616 also says -
"4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems."
They could say the RFMP is not a weapon - it does not "fire a bullet," but it is part of a weapons system. There are clearly serious issues of definition in Kucinich's new Bill. It is conceivable that the RFMP / VTRPE weapons system may fall in the area covered by HR3616.
It remains a mystery as to how the word 'chemtrails' appeared in HR 2977 to begin with. Investigation into that point is ongoing. Who actually is authoring the text of these bills? Why such an emphasis on "exotic weapons" in HR 2977 but then nothing mentioned about them in HR 3616?
My call to Rep. Kucinich's Washington office last week was brief. I was told there had been "quite a few" calls regarding HR 2977. I was then told my questions should be directed to the person on the congressman's staff who handled that bill. I was then transfered to that person and received...big surprise...their voice mail service. I left a message with my contact information. No reply has been received to date(1-27-2 date of article) . I will place a follow-up call again this week. We suggest others do the same.
Even though the term 'chemtrails' has been removed from the revised bill, efforts to continue to educate and alert others about the chemtrail issue go on. Many thanks to those who have taken the time to contact their Congressional Representatives, keep it up.
We still know what we see.
We still didn't consent.
We still want it stopped.
Lorie Kramer ChemTrail Tracking USA
Space Preservation Act of 2002
(Introduced in the House)
HR 3616 IH
107th CONGRESS
2nd Session
H.R. 3616
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
January 23, 2002
Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned A BILL;
To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by prohibiting the basing of weapons in space and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit, and for other purposes.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the 'Space Preservation Act of 2002'.SEC. 2. REAFFIRMATION OF POLICY ON THE PRESERVATION OF PEACE IN SPACE.
Congress reaffirms the policy expressed in section 102(a) of the National Aeronautics and Space Act of 1958 (42 U.S.C. 2451(a)), stating that it `is the policy of the United States that activities in space should be devoted to peaceful purposes for the benefit of all mankind.'.SEC. 3. BAN ON BASING OF WEAPONS IN SPACE AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT.
The President shall-- (1) implement a ban on space-based weapons of the United States and the use of weapons of the United States to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit; and (2) immediately order the termination of research and development, testing, manufacturing, production, and deployment of all space-based weapons of the United States.SEC. 4. INTERNATIONAL TREATY BANNING SPACE-BASED WEAPONS AND THE USE OF WEAPONS AGAINST OBJECTS IN SPACE IN ORBIT.
The President shall direct the United States representatives to the United Nations and other international organizations to immediately work toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing an international treaty banning space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit.SEC. 5. REPORT.
The President shall submit to Congress not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and every 6 months thereafter, a report on--(1) the implementation of the ban on space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit required by section 3; and
(2) progress toward negotiating, adopting, and implementing the treaty described in section 4.SEC. 6. SPACE-BASED NONWEAPONS ACTIVITIES.
Nothing in this Act may be construed as prohibiting the use of funds for--(1) space exploration;
(2) space research and development;
(3) testing, manufacturing, or production that is not related to space-based weapons or systems; or
(4) civil, commercial, or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are not related to space-based weapons or systems.
SEC. 7. DEFINITIONS.
In this Act:(1) The term 'space' means all space extending upward from an altitude greater than 60 kilometers above the surface of the earth and any celestial body in such space.
(2) The terms `space-based weapon' and `space-based system' mean a device capable of damaging or destroying an object or person (whether in outer space, in the atmosphere, or on earth) by--
(A) firing one or more projectiles to collide with that object or person;
(B) detonating one or more explosive devices in close proximity to that object or person;
(C) directing a source of energy against that object or person; or
(D) any other undeveloped means.
Comment
From Carol Rosin
rosin@west.net
1-28-2
Perhaps I can help correct some fuzzy infomration that is being spread about H.R.3616, the Space Preservation Act of 2002, and Congressman Dennis Kucinich.
This bill will only ban space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damage objects in space that are in orbit. It is NOT a bill to ban chemtrails and/or psychotronics or mind control devises or any specific weapons listed in the category of definitions in the original bill.
I'm not sure where that rumor started, but in any case, those definitional were only listed on the original bill for definitional purposes...to exemplify what space-based weapons might be deployed in space if the space-based weapons bill isn't passed. Frequently bills are revised, and things like definitions are removed. No big deal. The legislation is in no way compromised. This Congressman and his legislation maintain their integrity and commitment to ban spae-based weapons. It was never a bill to ban chemtrails or mind control technologies.
Congressman Dennis Kucinich is champion of the progressive issues. He sane man, has integrity, courageous, he is spiritually aware. We are lucky to have legislation to ban space-based weapons introduced in the current atmosphere buy this statesman.
President Bush will break the ABMTreaty in June. Then he can deploy space-based weapons under the guise of it being "MERELY testing." This administration has announcemd commitment to "doiinate and control" earth and space. I don't think some want that to happen.
People and organizations are connecting in what could become the fastest growing movement in history...to ban ALL space-based weapons and the use of weapons to destroy or damge objects in spce that re in orbit.
This bill does not prohibit space exploration, space research and development, etc., of a non space-based weapons nature. It does prohibit firing one or more projectiles to collide withtht object of person, detonating one of more explosive devices in close proximity to that object or person, directing a source of energy against that object or person, or any other means. And it allows for the civil, commercial or defense activities (including communications, navigation, surveillance, reconnaissance, early warning, or remote sensing) that are NOT related to space-based weapons or systems.
There is a compatible World Treaty Banning Space-based Weapons being circulated that calls for a world space peacekeeping agency to monitor and enforce the ban.
The Plan of Action will be announced in mid-February.
Hundreds of groups have already signed on to support the Kucinich legislation, and people are networking worldwide in solidarity about this who have different perspectives and issues but who know that we only have one chance in time to get this national and world law passed to ban space-based weapons.
Congressman Kucniich deserves our appreciation and support. A Senator will introduce soon, as will a nation-state leader.
Go to www.peaceinspace.com to find out more.
Thank you.
Carol Rosin President,
Institute for Cooperation in Space
rosin@west.net
Comment
From Bea Bernhausen
beabernhausen@yahoo.com
1-29-2
What people picking apart Bills HR2977 and HR3616 don't seem to understand, is that although the latter has been changed in scope---it is still way ahead of "nothing" which is what we had before, not to mention that Bill HR2977 brought chemtrails and mind control to the attention of thousands of people who had never heard of them before, as well as revitalizing a sagging chemtrail community. Wouldn't it be far more beneficial to thank Congressman Kucinich, stand behind him, give Bill HR3616 positve energy---and demand it's passage?
We pay lipservice to the technology that will be deployed once the ABM Treaty becomes null--but it's as if it was merely an intellectual exercise instead of the reality it is. We pass around the horror stories of what these weapons can achieve as if they were mere concepts rather than facts. We talk of the US government/shadow government agenda of world wide domination---as laid out in Vision 2020, (which the last time I checked---has mysteriously disappeared from the US government website at <www.spacecom.af.mil/usspace, but can still be found at <www.ploughshares.ca--though only by a circuitous route [<http://www.af.mil/vision/ ])---as if it was happening on some other planet.
As we know, chemtrails are only one step towards this agenda. Chemtrails are not likely to stop by our trying to find fault with this Bill---in fact quite the opposite. The ABM Treaty will be terminated in June. Once deployment of space based weapons begins,(legally) without any accountability whatsoever, it will be unstoppable. The technology available today means without a doubt complete control of our minds, hearts--in fact our very being. We must comprehend this reality. While we fiddle, Rome burns and the AGENDA marches on. We would be far wiser to grant this proposal all our support---while we still can. While we still even know we can.
But that's not all. The force we build by standing together, moving in a positive direction can and will spill over to all other areas. We can build a momentum which will change the tide, change the negative thinking now predominant on this planet. Technology is a double edged sword. It's possible uses for healing are as great as they are for destroying. We are at the last threshold; the choice is up to us. Why not take a chance--for once join forces and stand unified behind this plan, along with the hundreds of organizations that are already doing so.
Unless of course somebody has a better idea...
Thank You
Bea BernhausenThis article was originally posted at www.rense.com
Uploaded: 07-30-03